Property request · variance
Earl J. Langaas, II: allow a structure (91 Arthur Court)
Board of Zoning Appeals hearing (county’s record, Apr 1)Apr 1
Board of Zoning Appeals decides (county’s record, Apr 1)Approved, unanimously · Apr 1
A step the records show opens the record itself.
In plain words
Earl J. Langaas, II, owner, asked for a variance to allow a structure less than the required 35 feet from the street right-of-way.1 The property is Tax Map Parcel #28-C(1)-7 at 91 Arthur Court, zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront.1 The Board of Zoning Appeals continued the hearing on the request.1 On April 1, 2025, the Board reviewed the revised site plan for the garage, and there were no further objections about its size and placement.2 John Hendrickson made a motion to approve the request as revised, Daniel Wiggins seconded, and the Board unanimously voted to approve.2
Summarized from the county’s records, September 30.
Where each sentence comes from
- “for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-49 to allow a structure less than the required 35 feet from the street right-of-way” … “The property is located on Tax Map Parcel #28-C(1)-7 at 91 Arthur Court.” … “The Board then continued the hearing on a request by Earl J. Langaas, II, owner”The matter as the records title it
- “After reviewing the revised site plan for the garage and there having been no further objections regarding the size and placement of the garage” … “John Hendrickson made a motion to approve the request as revised. Daniel Wiggins seconded the motion. The Board unanimously voted to approve the request.”Apr 1, 2025 · Board of Zoning Appeals · In the minutes
Written automatically from the county’s records. Each sentence has to quote the record it comes from, word for word, or it’s left out. The records have the final say.
The official wording
The Board then continued the hearing on a request by Earl J. Langaas, II, owner, for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-49 to allow a structure less than the required 35… Show allShow less
The Board then continued the hearing on a request by Earl J. Langaas, II, owner, for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-49 to allow a structure less than the required 35 feet from the street right-of-way on property zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront. The property is located on Tax Map Parcel #28-C(1)-7 at 91 Arthur Court.
Zoning districts here
R-2 · Residential WaterfrontWhat the ordinance says it’s forHide
“The purpose of this district is to protect the water and shorelines of the County by providing for safe and orderly shoreline development. In this district, residential, recreational and conservancy uses are permitted as are a limited number of commercial uses that would be compatible with the residential character of the local (or immediate) area.”
Zoning Ordinance § 148-46
Words the law defines
Variance
“‘Variance’ means, in the application of a zoning ordinance, a reasonable deviation from those provisions regulating the shape, size, or area of a lot or parcel of land or the size, height, area, bulk, or location of a building or structure when the strict application of the ordinance would unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property, and such need for a variance would not be shared generally by other properties, and provided such variance is not contrary to the purpose of the ordinance.”
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2201, Chapter 22. Planning, Subdivision of Land and Zoning
Site plan
“‘Site plan’ means the proposal for a development or a subdivision including all covenants, grants or easements and other conditions relating to use, location and bulk of buildings, density of development, common open space, public facilities and such other information as required by the subdivision ordinance to which the proposed development or subdivision is subject.”
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2201, Chapter 22. Planning, Subdivision of Land and Zoning
What’s happened
- Tue1Apr
Board of Zoning Appeals · a vote
ApprovedEarl J. Langaas, II: allow a structure (91 Arthur Court)
After reviewing the revised site plan for the garage and there having been no further objections regarding the size and placement of the garage, John Hendrickson made a motion to approve… Show allAfter reviewing the revised site plan for the garage and there having been no further objections regarding the size and placement of the garage, John Hendrickson made a motion to approve the request as revised. Daniel Wiggins seconded the motion. The Board unanimously voted to approve the request.
Moved by Hendrickson, seconded by Wiggins
- Tue4Mar
Meeting by meeting, newest first, in the records’ own words. Each vote names the minutes it’s written in.
The records
Gathered from Northumberland County’s agendas, minutes and notices. Checked October 26.