Property request · variance
Dorothy W. Tate: allow an existing structure (310 Bridge Creek Circle)
Board of Zoning Appeals hearing (county’s record, Jun 2)Jun 2
Board of Zoning Appeals decides (county’s record, Jun 2)Approved, 4-0 · Jun 2
A step the records show opens the record itself.
In plain words
Dorothy W. Tate, owner, asked for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-51.1 The request would allow an existing structure less than the required 10 feet from the side property line at 310 Bridge Creek Circle, Tax Map Parcel# 29-B(2)C-11.1 The Board of Zoning Appeals heard the request on Jun 2, 2026, when Tate described the conditions which created the need for a lot line adjustment and variance.2 She said she purchased her parents home in 2012, without a survey, after John Hendrickson asked when the property was purchased.2 With no objections received, Chairman Crabbe made a motion to approve the survey, Daniel Wiggins seconded, and the Board voted 4 to 0 to approve.3
Summarized from the county’s records, September 26.
Where each sentence comes from
- “a request by Dorothy W. Tate, owner, for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-51” … “to allow an existing structure less than the required 10 feet from the side property line. The property is located on Tax Map Parcel# 29-B(2)C-11 at 310 Bridge Creek Circle.”The matter as the records title it
- “Dorothy Tate described the conditions which created the need for a lot line adjustment and variance.” … “John Hendrickson asked when the property was purchased. Dorothy Tate said she purchased her parents home in 2012. She noted that it was purchased without a survey.”Jun 2, 2026 · Board of Zoning Appeals · On the agenda
- “having received no objections, Chairman Crabbe made a motion to approve the survey. Daniel Wiggins seconded the motion. The Board voted 4 to 0 to approve.”Jun 2, 2026 · Board of Zoning Appeals · In the minutes
Written automatically from the county’s records. Each sentence has to quote the record it comes from, word for word, or it’s left out. The records have the final say.
The official wording
The Board then heard a request by Dorothy W. Tate, owner, for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-51, to allow an existing structure less than the required 10 feet from the… Show allShow less
The Board then heard a request by Dorothy W. Tate, owner, for a variance to the Northumberland County Zoning Ordinance, Article V, Section 148-51, to allow an existing structure less than the required 10 feet from the side property line. The property is located on Tax Map Parcel# 29-B(2)C-11 at 310 Bridge Creek Circle.
Words the law defines
Variance
“‘Variance’ means, in the application of a zoning ordinance, a reasonable deviation from those provisions regulating the shape, size, or area of a lot or parcel of land or the size, height, area, bulk, or location of a building or structure when the strict application of the ordinance would unreasonably restrict the utilization of the property, and such need for a variance would not be shared generally by other properties, and provided such variance is not contrary to the purpose of the ordinance.”
Code of Virginia § 15.2-2201, Chapter 22. Planning, Subdivision of Land and Zoning
What’s happened
- Tue2Jun
Board of Zoning Appeals · a vote
ApprovedDorothy W. Tate: allow an existing structure (310 Bridge Creek Circle)
After reviewing the request and the survey and having received no objections, Chairman Crabbe made a motion to approve the survey. Daniel Wiggins seconded the motion. The Board voted 4 to 0 to approve.
Moved by Crabbe, seconded by Wiggins
Meeting by meeting, newest first, in the records’ own words. Each vote names the minutes it’s written in.
The records
Gathered from Northumberland County’s agendas, minutes and notices. Checked October 26.