Property request · exception
Darryl & Joyce Krolicki: construct an addition to a dwelling (84 Crane Court)
Board decides (county’s record, May 14, p. 8)Approved, 5-0 · May 14
A step the records show opens the record itself.
In plain words
Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, asked for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance to construct an addition to a dwelling.1 The property is zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront, shown as Tax Map Parcel # 44-C(1)-22, and located at 84 Crane Court.1 The Board of Supervisors tabled the request at its April 9, 2026 meeting, moving it to the next regular meeting.2,3 At that meeting Mr. Krolicki described building a deck behind the house, and Mr. Jason Swift with Bay Design group said his firm prepared the plans.4 The Board voted 5-0 to approve the Exception with the suggested conditions; voting yes were James Long, James Brann, Chip Williams, Al Fisher and Keith Harris.5 The conditions limit the deck to a twelve (12) foot width and thirty two (32) foot length, with vegetative plantings and four (4) inches of gravel.4
Summarized from the county’s records, September 26.
Where each sentence comes from
- “for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance in order to construct an addition to a dwelling” … “zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront. The property is shown as Tax Map Parcel # 44-C(1)-22 and is located at 84 Crane Court”The matter as the records title it
- “TABLED FROM THE APRIL 9, 2026 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING”May 14, 2026 · Board of Supervisors · On the agenda
- “TABLED TO THE NEXT REGULAR BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING”Apr 9, 2026 · Board of Supervisors · On the agenda
- “Mr. Krolicki explained the proposed project of constructing a deck behind the house.” … “Mr. Jason Swift with Bay Design group stated that they're who prepared the plans” … “The deck addition shall be limited to a twelve (12) foot width and thirty two (32) foot length” … “Four (4) inches of gravel shall be placed under the deck addition”TABLED FROM THE APRIL 9, 2026 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING; Request by Darryl & · full text
- “Vote 5-0: yes, James Long, James Brann, Chip Williams, Al Fisher, Keith Harris; no, none.” … “Motion to approve the request by Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance”May 14, 2026 · Board of Supervisors · Motion carried, 5-0
Written automatically from the county’s records. Each sentence has to quote the record it comes from, word for word, or it’s left out. The records have the final say.
The official wording
Request by Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance in order to construct an addition to a dwelling on property zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront. The property… Show allShow less
Request by Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance in order to construct an addition to a dwelling on property zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront. The property is shown as Tax Map Parcel # 44-C(1)-22 and is located at 84 Crane Court.
Zoning districts here
R-2 · Residential WaterfrontWhat the ordinance says it’s forHide
“The purpose of this district is to protect the water and shorelines of the County by providing for safe and orderly shoreline development. In this district, residential, recreational and conservancy uses are permitted as are a limited number of commercial uses that would be compatible with the residential character of the local (or immediate) area.”
Zoning Ordinance § 148-46
What’s happened
- Thu14May
Board of Supervisors · a vote
ApprovedThe Board’s vote
Motion to approve the request by Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance to construct an addition to a dwelling on property zoned… Show allMotion to approve the request by Darryl & Joyce Krolicki, owners, for an Exception to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance to construct an addition to a dwelling on property zoned R-2, Residential Waterfront with the suggested conditions. This motion is made in due consideration of the administrative record before the body, including the planning commission’s deliberations and recommendation, the information received via the public hearing, including statements offered by staff, the applicant, and members of the public, the public health and safety, the general welfare of the community, public necessity, convenience, in the exercise of good zoning practices and the body’s legislative prerogative, and pursuant to the body’s statutory authority.
Moved by Fisher, seconded by Long
It begins: “Now we're going to start a public hearing uh table from April 9th. We got a request by Daryl and Joyce Blicki” From the video’s automatic captions, which mishear words.
3 documents given to the board
- Thu9Apr
Meeting by meeting, newest first, in the records’ own words. Each vote names the minutes it’s written in.
The records
- Thu14May
- Thu9Apr
Gathered from Northumberland County’s agendas, minutes and notices. Checked October 26.